Clean-in-Place (CIP) Troubleshooting

Clean-in-Place Troubleshooting—Following the Water Principle

Clean-in-place troubleshooting often becomes more complicated than it needs to be. When a CIP or assisted cleaning system is not performing as expected, many people often forget the simple basics: if water is pumped into the system, it should follow the intended flow path and come back out. Tracing that path can help teams identify blocked valves, incorrect pump rotation, clogged strainers, damaged check valves, failed spray devices, and other causes of inadequate flow.

The Following the Water Principle is just that, as shown below in a single pass CIP/ACS system.

Sample flow path of a single pass CIP/ACS system.

A Clean-In-Place Checklist

Note to self, check for water!

Staying true to following the water principle, the first key item is ensuring you have water. I cannot tell you how many times over the years, the root cause of a problem has been a faulty water supply valve or level probe not allowing water to fill the tank.

  1. Tank outlet valve – Once you have confirmed that there is water in the tank, the next step in the path is the tank outlet valve (A). First, make sure that the valve is open.
  2. Centrifugal pumps – Most CIP/ACS supply pumps (B) are centrifugal pumps. The pumps will pump water forward and backward; however, the output is about 50% of the forward flow rate when running backward. It is a common mistake not to recognize this when maintenance is done, and the pump rotation is not verified after corrective actions have been completed. While this will not stop CIP flow, it will significantly impact the pump output volume.
  3. Inline strainer – Newer systems will have a pressure transmitter on each side of the inline strainer (C) to show the pressure differential to indicate a potential blockage. Older systems were not fitted with proper gauges or instruments for troubleshooting. So again, follow the water. Remember, if there is a blockage, there could be high pressures built up.
  4. Shell and tube heat exchanger – While shell-and-tube heat exchangers (D) do not typically malfunction, you should never say never…I did have a collapsed tube bundle about 15 years ago that was blocking CIP flow by about 80%. Again, it was not easy to find but following the water led me to the root cause.
  5. Air blow check valve – The air blow check valve (E) could also be considered a backflow prevention device to block the supply pump from running backward between the different CIP step functions. The device shown in our drawing is called a Y check.
Inline “Y” check valve device

What Causes Flow Problems in a Clean-in-Place System?

CIP flow problems can result from clogged lines, blocked check valves, damaged valve components, or devices that become stuck in the open, closed, or partially open position. Tracing the CIP flow path can help teams locate these restrictions and determine why cleaning solution is not moving through the system as intended.

CIP flow enters the check valve inlet, and then the fluid pushes the ball into the open cavity to the left, following the red arrow direction. At the same time the ball is being forced up into the cavity, it also rises above the check valve, following the (A) direction. Normally the balls used inside these check valves are rubber-coated stainless steel balls. Therefore, the balls will not fit in the (A) cavity, only in the direction of the red arrow. That is true until the rubber coating on the balls fails.

As a point of interest, I have had to use a large handheld sledgehammer and brass bar to beat one of those stainless steel balls out of a cavity (A) where it had become jammed by the high-velocity force provided by the supply pump.

Another popular version of check valves is shown below. These are disc check valves and are even more susceptible to getting blocked or locked in the open, closed, or some position in the middle.

Examples of disc check valve devices

These devices typically have a higher pressure drop than the ball check valves, but they do fit in smaller footprints. Because they do not open nearly as far as other devices, it does not take nearly as much to clog them. These devices are also very sensitive to damage from hydraulic shock in the system.

The item being cleaned or the spray devices in use could be clogged, blocked, or failed.

Compromised spray device (left) and open free flowing spray device (right) examples

Verify Cleaning Effectiveness with Representative Sampling

Restoring CIP flow does not necessarily confirm that the cleaned process is hygienically under control. Representative samples collected at strategic process locations after cleaning can help teams compare microbial results, evaluate cleaning effectiveness, and identify areas that may require closer inspection, maintenance, or sanitation review.

QualiTru aseptic sampling systems allow samples to be collected from closed process lines and vessels without opening the system to the surrounding environment.

Document the Clean-in-Place Process Before Troubleshooting

One thing that you must always keep in mind when following the water principle is that if you are not finding it, either it did not get started on its journey, as noted in the failed level control, or there is a blockage somewhere in the process. Therefore, having your process documented is a critical first step. Not only is it important to understand how the CIP/ACS is engineered, it is also important to know what each step does.

Below is a CIP rinse step drawing.


(Source: Rick Rector, Director of CIP and Dairy for the Zee Company – Division of the Vincit Group.)

In Clean-In-Place, the Devil is Always in the Details

The more your team understands about CIP design, product flow, and cleaning sequences, the easier it becomes to follow the water and identify where a problem may be occurring. The diagram above shows an individual circuit extraction with the CIP path highlighted, helping teams visualize how cleaning solution should move through the system.

Effective troubleshooting requires more than finding a blocked valve or failed device. Teams also need current process documentation, a clear understanding of what each step is intended to accomplish, and verification methods that show whether the cleaning process is performing as expected.

With changing responsibilities, employee turnover, and the loss of experienced personnel, practical tools and shared process knowledge are critical components of your consistent quality management system.

Strengthen Your Team’s Clean-in-Place Troubleshooting Skills

Employee turnover and shifting responsibilities can make it difficult to maintain consistent CIP knowledge across teams. QualiTru’s Technical Services Education Training Program provides practical, industry-focused training to help employees build sanitation knowledge, strengthen troubleshooting skills, and apply verification practices more consistently.

Need Help with Clean-In-Place Verification or Sampling?

QualiTru’s technical experts can help your team evaluate sampling locations, strengthen post-cleaning verification, and identify opportunities to collect more representative process data.